中文提要
　　房屋拆迁是近年来社会生活中的热点问题，为社会大众所普遍关注。拆迁裁决在不少人看来只是一个普通行政执法行为，但在实践中却面临着严峻的挑战。在人民法院受理的有关拆迁行政案件中，起诉补偿安置裁决居首位，且群体性诉讼较多。出现这一情况的原因是复杂的，但现行裁决体制、程序上的问题则是根本的。本文首先从历史、利益、立法的视角分析了政府在拆迁裁决中既当运动员又当裁判员的原因，进而阐明了这一体制在保证裁决机构独立性、程序公正性、实体公正性上所存在的问题。文章在介绍七国公用征收裁决模式并进行优劣分析的基础上，结合中国国情，认为中国应当引进司法化裁决模式，同时对如何设置公用征收法庭、公用征收法院、公用征收上诉法院提出了相关的建议。文章最后在对一般裁决程序作出构建分析后，提出为保证军事、防洪等重大公共利益工程能迅速有效地推进，在对公共利益进行分层的基础上，裁决程序中应当引进国外的加速程序。第一层次的公共利益征收可实施非常紧急程序，第二层次的公共利益征收可采取紧急程序。
　　关键词：房屋拆迁   司法化   加速程序
　　作    者：钱  军
　　指导老师：王克稳  教授

　　Study on Judicatorizing Arbitration of Dwelling House Breaking and Moving
　　Abstract
　　Dwelling house breaking and moving has been a heated topic in people’s daily life recently, which also attracts the attention of common people. In the opinion of most people, the arbitration of dwelling house breaking and moving is only the ordinary law execution. However, as a matter of fact , in practice it faces the austere challenge. Among the appellate cases about dwelling house breaking and moving which the court accepts, impleading the arbitration of resettling places the top, especially the lawsuit of the masses. The reason why the phenomena appear is complicated, but the problems about the current arbitrative system and procedure are fundamental., The essay ,from historical ,beneficial and legislative angle, analyzes the reason why the government acts as a sportsman and a judge at the same time during the arbitration of dwelling house breaking and moving, and furtherly enucleates the above-mentioned system, which guarantees the independence of arbitrative institution, the justice of procedure and entity, causes problems. The essay ,on the basis of the analyses of excellence and inferiority, and, combining with the situation of China, introduces the mode of communal collection of seven countries, and reckons that China is supposed to introduce judicatory arbitrative mode, and at the same time, gives some suggestions on how to set up communal collection court, communal collection appealing court. In the last part, the essay analyzes the ecumenical arbitrative procedure, and put forward the theory that the arbitrative procedure, in order to ensure that the grand public benefit projects related to military and flood prevention could be effectively advanced, based on delaminating public benefits should introduce overseas accelerated procedure. The first level is that public benefit collection can implement extremely urgent, the second level is that public benefit collection can take urgent procedure.
　　Key words: dwelling house breaking and moving   judicatorize    
　　accelerated procedure
　　Written by: Qian Jun
　　Supervised by: Wang Kewen