你的位置:首页 >> 司法实践 >> 借鉴 >> 正文                双击自动滚屏
American Legal System and Trial by Jury

http://www.dffy.com 2004-12-22 18:52:45 作者:Olof 来源:东方法眼

    绿  


  Requirements of juror: 18 years old
  Registered to vote
  No criminal record

  Jury selection:
  - notices mailed out to potential jurors (notices are sent to people chosen at random from the voter registration forms). Notice demands that the person appear before the court for an interview (for example 200 people may show up to be interviewed for the jury). Appearance before the court is mandatory (punishable by law). Lawyers then question the jurors to discover any possible biases (relationship with anyone involved in the case). If bias is discovered the lawyers will exercise right to exclude that person from the jury.
  - Finally, the jury is selected with a number of alternate jurors who will be used if a juror is unable to continue his duties.
  - Jurors receive compensation of $25/day plus housing and meals.
  - No knowledge required to be jury

  Criminal versus Civil courts differ only in procedure.

  If a defendant cannot afford an attorney the court will appoint an attorney to defend him. If the defendant has money/assets above the poverty limits ($2000/month), he must pay for his own attorney.

  Constitutional system: Judicial/Executive/Legislative
  Judge = Judicial (interpret law)
  Police = Exucutive (enforce law)
  Congress = Legislative (make the law)
  Judge has the power to request an investigation of the police in a case. Any lawful order issued by a judge must be enforced by the police (also, police must request permission from a judge to search a suspect’s property). If police don’t enforce a judge’s order, police may be guilty of a crime. Police obtain warrant by providing the judge with “probable cause.”

  Administrative Authority vs. Judicial Authority: Judicial authority is higher

  American law is based on British Commonlaw

  Chinese Law is similar to French/Continental system of justice

  It is illegal for a judge to discuss a case with other people (also: lawyers, jurors).

  Perjury: lying in court

  Judges rules based on evidence provided in court. Judge cannot base his judgment on his feelings. If the defendant thinks the judge used his own feelings to make a judgment they can appeal the case to the appellate court who will review the decision and decide whether or not it deserves another trial.

  (记录人:Nathan Simmons)
  Olof Johannsen法官与本站副站长李富成


  查看Olof的其他文章 本文关键词:陪审员

收藏到法律网摘 讨论 打印 页顶 关闭


编辑:李富金

相关文章

 

· 江苏海门:人民陪审员海选 (2008-6-20 17:07:24)
· 最高人民法院关于人民陪审员管理办法(试行) (2008-4-17 15:06:54)
· 人民陪审员制度的价值与功能 (2007-11-2 8:52:55)
· 人民陪审员制度初探 (2007-7-3 19:13:38)
· 对人民陪审员制度的几点思考 (2007-4-2 13:29:07)
· 刍议在我国婚姻法中增设知情权——从婚姻法的视角出发 (2006-11-4 17:02:54)
· 人民陪审员制度存在的问题及完善 (2006-11-4 17:01:48)
· 论我国人民陪审员制度的价值及其完善 (2006-8-15 21:48:13)


上一篇:假发 (2004-12-16 19:03:20)
下一篇:一场关于人和猴子关系的审判 (2005-1-7 7:06:25)

Google
最新文章

博客日志

博客相册
法眼论坛

 

东方法眼保留全部权利,未经协议授权不得转载。